2024 Architectural Education Award Winners

ACSA is pleased to announce the 2024 Architectural Education Award Winners. Each year, ACSA honors architectural educators for exemplary work in areas such as building design, community collaborations, scholarship, and service. Award winners inspire and challenge students, contribute to the profession’s knowledge base, and extend their work beyond the borders of academy into practice and the public sector.

Read about all the winners below and in the PRESS RELEASE. Be sure to join us in celebrating the winners at the ACSA 112th Annual Meeting in Vancouver, BS, March 14 – 16, 2024.

TM   |   DP   |   NFT   |   DA   |   CA   |   CP   |   FD   |   DB   |   PL   |   HDE   |   JAE  |   TAD   |   BPP

AIA/ACSA Topaz Medallion for Architectural Education

Awarded to an individual who has had significant impact upon architectural education and the discipline and practice of architecture.

An AIA/ACSA Award.

Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk
University of Miami

As dean of the school, a position she held for 18 years, she augmented the Bachelor of Architecture degree with two- and three-year master’s degrees in architecture, a post-professional master’s in urban design, and a master’s in real estate development and urbanism. In addition, she raised more than $10 million to support professorships, new programs, and the construction of three new facilities. During her leadership, the school experienced significant institutional growth, and she nurtured a culture of intellectual exchange, encouraging faculty to engage in research and share their work in publications.

Informed by her experience as a co-founder of the Congress for the New Urbanism, she continues to teach important courses on architecture and urban design, including the recently developed course “Adaptation to Climate Change.” Her former students can be found engaged in design initiatives in communities across the globe. In addition, Plater-Zyberk holds a parallel appointment within the university’s Miller School of Medicine and collaborates with faculty peers on research on the built environment’s impact on human health. She continues to lecture widely and is a visiting professor at institutions of higher education in the U.S., Europe, and Asia, presenting more than 100 lectures in the past decade alone.

Read More & Image Credits

Outside of the academy, Plater-Zyberk continues to practice at DPZ CoDesign, the Miami-based firm she co-founded in 1980 with Andrés Duany, FAIA. Building on its well-established reputation for innovation and community design, the firm now boasts six partners with offices across the nation. Its work, widely celebrated with awards and honors, has contributed to the discourse on community, town planning, and urban design.

Image Credits:
Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk
Photo credit: DPZ CoDesign
Website: www.dpz.com
Phone: 305-644-1023

Bermuda Village, Coral Gables
(designed 2001)
Photo credit: DPZ CoDesign
A courtyard housing block that serves as a transition between a commercial area and single-family houses

Design District, Miami
(designed 2011)
Photo credit: Ra-Haus (Website: ra-haus.com, Phone: 305-338-1746)
An early LEED-ND certified mixed-use infill creating a unique environment for Miami’s luxury retail and living market, enhancing urban fabric and adding access and walkability to the neighborhood.

Aqua, Allison Island, MIami Beach
(designed 1998)
Photo credit: Steven Brooke (Website: stevenbrooke.com, Phone: 305-321-3270)
A mid-rise and townhouse neighborhood that serves as a transition between high rises and single-family houses.

Kentlands, Gaithersburg, MD
(designed 1987)
Photo credit: DPZ CoDesign
One of New Urbanism’s pioneer developments, Kentlands’ defining features are now considered commonplace in Smart Growth best practices.

Distinguished Professor

To recognize individuals that have had a positive, stimulating, and nurturing influence upon students.

Winner
Lynne Dearborn
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Bio

Advocacy for equity and justice in the built environment is the guiding force of Lynne M. Dearborn’s forty-year career as an architect and educator, and as a leader in key national organizations such as ACSA and AIA. Through her change-focused tenure as president of ACSA and as a steadfast member of the AIA’s Design and Health Leadership Committee and the AIA-ACSA Design and Health Research Consortium, Lynne has brought awareness of the critical role the built environment plays in the every-day lives of all people. Her efforts in ACSA and the AIA to advance racial equity and wellbeing through design and organizational policy broadly impact students, educators, and professionals. Lynne is a scholar and educator who amplifies diverse worldviews and explicates power structures to influence professional and educational policy making. Her research and public engagement with low-income and minority communities have been supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Fetzer Institute, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, HUD’s Office of Native American Programs, and Illinois Department of Public Health and she has authored over 150 publications and reports disseminating the results of her work. Her equity lens has influenced several thousand students at the University of Illinois through her role as teacher, mentor, and advisor. Because of her twenty years of community-engagement studios in historically under-resourced cities in the U.S. Midwest, Haiti, and São Tomé, community partners can imagine more livable communities for their residents and have secured vital infrastructure improvements in streets, sidewalks, sewers, parks, housing, and community spaces. Likewise, her foresight and energy in developing and teaching the University of Illinois’ Health and Wellbeing curriculum have transformed the perspective of several generations of architecture and planning alumni who are now empowered to make a difference in the lives of those with the least political, social, and economic capital in society.
Winner
Mohammad Gharipour
University of Maryland

Bio

Mohammad Gharipour is Professor, Director, and Area Chair of the Architecture Program at the University of Maryland. He obtained his PhD in architecture at Georgia Institute of Technology, USA. He has received many awards, fellowships, and grants from several organizations, including the Society of Architectural Historians (2008), Dumbarton Oaks (2010), National Endowment in Humanities (2015), Fulbright-Hays (2016), Foundation for Landscape Studies (2016), Council of Educators of Landscape Architecture (2016), American Institute of Architects (2018), Fulbright (2019), National Institute of Health (2020), and Architectural Research Centers Consortium (2022). In 2016 Diverse: Issues in Higher Education selected him as one of the minority scholars in the US who are making their mark in academia. He is currently a fellow of the Academic Leadership program at the Big Ten Academic Alliance.

In addition to organizing and chairing more than forty panels and conferences and publishing more than 150 papers, book chapters, encyclopedia entries, and reviews, he has authored, edited, and co-edited fifteen books including Bazaar in the Islamic City (American University of Cairo Press, 2012), Persian Gardens and Pavilions (I.B.Tauris, 2013), Synagogues of the Islamic World (Edinburgh University Press, 2017), Social Housing in the Middle East (Indiana University Press, 2019), Architectural Dynamics in Pre-Revolutionary Iran (Intellect, 2019), Health and Architecture (Bloomsbury, 2021), and Islamic Architecture Today and Tomorrow (Intellect, 2022). Dr. Gharipour is the co-editor of the book series on the Architecture of the Middle East (Intellect and Chicago University Press) and Health and the Built Environment (Routledge).

Dr. Gharipour has served as a jury for design competitions, many book awards, and research awards and fellowships. He is the founder and editor in chief of the award-winning International Journal of Islamic Architecture (IJIA), the director and co-founder of the Epidemic Urbanism Initiative, and the first vice president of the Society of Architectural Historians.

AIAS/ACSA New Faculty Teaching

To recognize demonstrated excellence and innovation in teaching performance during the formative years of an architectural teaching career.

An AIAS/ACSA Award.

Full-Time Faculty Winner
Lindsey Krug
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Bio

Lindsey Krug (she/hers) is a designer and researcher based between Chicago and Milwaukee, and an Assistant Professor of Architecture at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee School of Architecture and Urban Planning (SARUP). She holds a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Pennsylvania and a Master of Architecture from the Harvard University Graduate School of Design.

Through the lens of the architectural user as a body in space, Krug studies how design solidifies and reinforces taboos, hierarchies, and inequities into built form, and positions architecture as a biopsying tool that unveils tensions between spatial foibles and cultural conventions of identity, politics, class, and sociality. Krug’s research interests are organized around relationships between people and contemporary institutions born of American democracy and capitalism and their corresponding architectural manifestations and myths. Two such institutions of focus are the U.S. Supreme Court and the topic of privacy as it’s defined legally and architecturally, and Dollar General Corporation with its small-box retail empire. These research threads are reflected in the courses Krug teaches as her design briefs and syllabi help students confront contemporary issues and current events as part of their design education in order to facilitate students imagining radical and optimistic architectural futures.

Krug’s design research titled “Corpus Comunis: Precedent, Privacy, and the United States Supreme Court, in Seven Architectural Case Studies” was awarded the 2023 Best Peer-Reviewed Research Project by the ACSA College of Distinguished Professors. Along with her frequent collaborator Sarah Aziz, Krug received the 2022 Course Development Prize in Architecture, Climate Change, and Society from the ACSA and the Columbia University Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the Study of American Architecture. Most recently, the pair was awarded the 2023 Architectural League Prize for Young Architects + Designers by the Architectural League of New York.

Full-Time Faculty Winner
Lukas Pauer
University of Toronto

Bio

Lukas Pauer is a licensed architect, urbanist, historian, educator, and the Founding Director of the Vertical Geopolitics Lab, an investigative practice and think-tank at the intersections of architecture, geography, politology, and media, dedicated to exposing intangible systems and hidden agendas within the built environment. At the University of Toronto (UofT), Lukas is an Assistant Professor of Architecture, Inaugural 2022-2024 Emerging Architect Fellow. There, his contribution at disciplinary intersections is reflected in his engagements as a Faculty Affiliate in Urban Studies at the UofT A&S SofC as well as a Faculty Affiliate in Global Affairs and Public Policy at the UofT Munk CERES. From the Architectural Association in London, he holds a PhD AD on political imaginaries in architectural and urban design history with a focus on how imperial-colonial expansion has been performed architecturally throughout history. Pauer holds an MAUD from Harvard University and an MSc Arch from ETH Zürich. Among widespread international recognition, he has been selected as an Ambassadorial Scholar by the Rotary Foundation, a Global Shaper by the World Economic Forum, and an Emerging Leader by the European Forum Alpbach — leadership programs committed to change-making impact within local communities.

In the industry, Pauer has extensive technical experience in construction gained at globally renowned architectural and landscape architectural design practices including Herzog & de Meuron Architekten and LCLA Office. In the academy, Pauer is a Fellow of the British Higher Education Academy. Most notably in the realm of international teaching awards, he has been recognized for having devised, co-ordinated, conducted, and assessed courses and workshops including thesis supervision and examination at leading institutions in Europe, the Americas, and Oceania. He has spoken publicly at organizations such as the World Bank Group, and has curated and convened public programs at venues including the Venice Architecture Biennale.

Full-Time Faculty Winner
Robert Williams
University of Massachusetts Amherst

Bio

Rob Williams is a practicing architect and Assistant Professor in the Department of Architecture at UMass Amherst. His practice-based research has been recognized through numerous peer-reviewed conference presentations and journal publications. He holds degrees from Cornell University (B.A. 2005, Magna Cum Laude) and The Rhode Island School of Design (M.Arch 2020 with honors) where he received the American Institute of Architects Henry Adams Gold Medal and the Henry D. Fernandez Award for Excellence in History and Theory.

Professor Williams’ professional practice, research, and teaching center on climate change mitigation through decarbonization in the residential design and construction sector. Professionally, he has designed a series of award-winning high-performance single family and multifamily residential buildings that achieve substantial reductions in energy use and carbon impact, including multiple passive house projects. Professor Williams’ research expands on his professional expertise through the lens of pragmatic sustainability, an approach that prioritizes holistic carbon impact as the critical tool for assessing environmental impact and sustainability in building design. This includes, for example, analyses of the trade-offs between embodied and operational carbon in passive house residential buildings, design of truly net-zero carbon accessory dwelling units, and assessments of the carbon impacts of building with recycled shipping containers. At UMass, Professor Williams has introduced significant innovations in the department’s approach to teaching building technology and design including redesigning the introductory building technology course, collaborating on revisions to the comprehensive studio sequence, and the introduction of sustainable design principles into studio course work. He is also a co-founder of the UMass DesignBuild program, a new interdisciplinary initiative where students collaborate to design and build low-energy and low-carbon homes for a local affordable housing provider.

Part-Time Faculty Winner
Gillian Shaffer Lutsko
University of Southern California

Bio

Gillian Shaffer is a Lecturer in Architecture at the University of Southern California, a designer and principal of the architecture studio, Studio Shaffer Lutsko, founded in 2020. She was also the 2022-23 Citizen Architect Fellow at USC. Studio Shaffer Lutsko has been recognized and supported by the National Endowment for the Arts, The Creative Europe Programme of the European Union, and Future Architecture Platform.

Shaffer’s work centers around the question of how architecture should respond to the most pressing issues of our time: the ongoing climate crisis; broader understandings of individual and cultural identities; worsening economic inequity; and the societal and cultural impacts of new technologies on space and visual media. Prior to USC, she taught studios at UCLA Architecture & Urban Design, The University of San Diego, Princeton University, and Pratt Institute. Shaffer has worked in offices in New York, Berlin, Tokyo, and Boston where she led architecture and urban projects. Her work has been exhibited and published internationally, including the Venice Biennale, the Seoul International Biennale on Architecture and Urbanism, and several galleries in New York City.

Diversity Achievement

To recognize the work of faculty, administrators, or students in creating effective methods and models to achieve greater diversity in curricula, school personnel, and student bodies, specifically to incorporate the participation and contributions of historically under-represented groups or contexts.

Winner

An Architectural Imaginary of Identity and Exclusion: Drawing Out the Legacies of Japanese American Designers after WWII Incarceration

Kelley Murphy
Washington University in St. Louis

Abstract

This multifaceted project incorporates the research, public discourse, exhibitions, and pedagogical initiatives that explore the legacies of the Japanese American designers, architects, and artists impacted by the Japanese American Incarceration in WWII. The research launched with Beauty in Enormous Bleakness: The Interned Generation of Japanese American Designers, a Divided Cities, Mellon-funded collaborative project between architectural designer Kelley Van Dyck Murphy, cultural historian Heidi Aronson Kolk, and architectural historian Lynnette Widder.  The project seeks to document the lives and works of Japanese American designers who survived internment, focusing on their vital contributions to the post-war cultural landscape while also acknowledging their lived experiences.

An exhibition, developed from the foundational research project and co-curated by Murphy and Kolk, placed personal artifacts, archival documents, and storytelling in conversation with architectural sites – evoking concepts of dislocation, erasure, and identity. The symposium, Moonscape of the Mind: Japanese American Design after Internment emerged from the Beauty in Enormous Bleakness research project and exhibition, and expanded the scope of the project to encompass a broader range of artists and designers. The cross-disciplinary symposium brought together scholars from a range of humanities and art/design fields to explore the legacies of the Japanese American WWII Incarceration through an exploration of the connection between material objects and their creators’ lived experiences.

Concurrent to the symposium and exhibition, Murphy began teaching an ongoing series of case-study courses about the work and lives of post-war Japanese American designers. As a designer and educator, Murphy is dedicated to advancing the conversations around diversity and cultural heritage in architecture and design. While the research projects and pedagogical work aspire to support a more diverse and inclusive architectural history, they also underscore the significance of how race, heritage, and context – cultural, historical, and material – impact the architectural landscape.

Winner

Blind Design Workshop: Advancing Inclusivity with Non-Visual Pedagogy

Andrew Gipe-Lazarou
Virginia Tech

Abstract & Video Link

Dr. Andrew Gipe-Lazarou (MArch GSD, Ph.D. NTUA) is a junior faculty member of the Virginia Tech School of Architecture, recently awarded the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Excellence Award by the College of Architecture, Arts, and Design, for his exceptional commitment to inclusive teaching, scholarship, and research.

Building on his prior experiences as an organizer of the first-ever architecture course for the blind and a project leader of blind-accessible international travel programs, Dr. Gipe-Lazarou established the Blind Design Workshop, an annual collaboration with the Virginia Department for the Blind and Vision Impaired (DBVI), in the spring of 2022. The five-day workshop brings 15+ vision-impaired learners, aged 14-24, from across the state to participate in a series of design exercises which are prepared by students in the School of Architecture. By exploring innovative non-visual means of design communication, and involving practitioners with disability as mentors, the workshop aims to empower vision-impaired participants with the understanding that they can meaningfully impact the design of the built environment. Doubling as a professional elective, the workshop also challenges students of architecture to question the ocular-centrism / discover the multi-sensory potential of their profession and to consider the significance of accessible space-making.

Dr. Gipe-Lazarou’s commitment to inclusivity is also evidenced by parallel accomplishments, including his certification by the International Association of Accessibility Professionals (IAAP); the curricular impact of his school-wide 2nd-year design competition brief; advising award-winning undergraduate thesis work addressing disability and design; participation in the international Future Bodies Symposium (2022) and Including Disability Global Summit (2023); the authorship of a forthcoming article evaluating the feasibility of non-visual architectural study and practice (funded by the Center for Humanities); and participation as Co-PI in a university- and state-funded research grant to develop a mobile phone application which integrates AI to facilitate non-visual description, navigation, and alerts.

Video Link:
Students and faculty host design workshop for the blind and visually impaired

Honorable Mention

Critical-Pathways

Suzanne Lettieri
Cornell University

Abstract

Critical Pathways is an ongoing collection of projects aimed at expanding methods of early-learning engagement through built work, paying particular attention to how design experiences can have large-scale impacts on more equitable pathways to higher education and develop a deeper understanding of the built environment. The broader intent of this work is to introduce underrepresented and marginalized high school students to architectural design as a viable path to post-secondary education. Importantly, the work also supports architectural literacy in secondary education, regardless of one’s decision to pursue the discipline.

Creative Achievement

To recognize a specific creative achievement in teaching, design, scholarship, research, or service that advances architectural education.

Winner

The Activated Atlas

Erin Kasimow
University of Southern California

Abstract & Video Links

The Activated Atlas was a series of 3 advanced topic studios comprised of upper level graduate and undergraduate students at the University of Southern California School of Architecture. Born out of the pandemic and the first semester of studio taught entirely via screen in fall 2020, it sought to exploit these conditions and invited students to harness the immediacy of working with film, photography, and social media as a way to literally locate one’s self and one’s architectural project and story within the city.  Using the oft photographed and filmed Los Angeles as a case study and wary of the stereotypically superficial image it is often lazily assigned, we considered the contradictions and eccentricities of LA, the highs and lows. Together as a studio, using animation, filming on location throughout the city, direct interviews with community members and research we assembled a collection of drawn and animated mappings that created multi-layered images of various neighborhoods and enclaves in Los Angeles. We explored how the formal and the material can yield to the social, political, and cultural through critical design proposals that represented inclusive and original stories.  We actively sought out opportunities to debunk incorrect assumptions, reveal hidden histories, and make unusual connections through narrative and image.  Each semester focused on a different neighborhood or region of Los Angeles and culminated with wildly different design proposals generated from student’s individual responses to the prompt of a socially conscious space. Proposals were shared entirely via short films and animations and ranged from speculative futures to the currently implementable — landscape and urban infrastructure, adaptive reuse, guidelines for new service industry standards and street vendors, installations and community based events.

Video Links:
SM BLVD Then and Now
Reforming Refuse

Winner

Serious Play: Reimagining Children’s Playscapes, From Speculation to Fabrication

Joseph Altshuler
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Abstract

Serious Play is a new graduate design program and community-engaged fabrication curriculum for the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s semester-long residency program in Chicago. The program includes an Advanced Design Research Studio and a Fabrication Seminar that collectively explore contemporary playscapes—spaces where play and learning converge, and where architecture becomes an active character that sparks curiosity and care, nurtures physical and emotional risk, and strengthens multi-generational relationships. As an institutional lens aligned with this agenda, the program re-imagines the future of children’s museums. While conventional children’s museums typically operate as a container for discrete exhibits designed by others, this curriculum challenges students to transform children museum’s architecture into a dynamic and interactive installation of its own, where the normative dichotomy between architecture as container versus architecture as content is strategically dismantled.

The program brought together architecture and landscape architecture students, setting up interdisciplinary teams where playscapes seamlessly mediate between building- and landscape-oriented strategies engaged with specific Chicago neighborhoods. With an emphatic effort to empower the students to work closely with real-world community partners, stakeholders, and collaborators and to take advantage of the fact that students from Urbana-Champaign were spending a semester “abroad” in Chicago, Altshuler initiated creative working partnerships with cultural institutions (the Chicago Children’s Museum and Design Museum of Chicago), local fabricators (Building Brown Workshop), and a K-8 public school community (KIPP One Primary).

Outcomes of this creative achievement include:

  • award-winning student design proposals for speculative children’s museums (recognized by multiple departments at University of Illinois and the AIA Chicago),
  • a well-attended exhibition at the Design Museum of Chicago that broadcast research on the future of playscapes to broad audiences, and
  • a fabricated permanent play structure installed in a local elementary school informed by a participatory process that engaged the school’s 4th students.
Winner

Making Space for Community – Learning from Collective Living as a Basis for Designing Policy

Neeraj Bhatia & Antje Steinmuller
California College of the Arts

Abstract

Compounding pressures on urban land have revealed the structural inequities in housing access that have forced many to live in precarious conditions. San Franciscans today are starved for more affordable housing that enable alternative types of families while providing forms of care, community, and support. New housing typologies that common domestic space—communes, co-living, cooperatives, amongst others—have built on historic California experiments while more precisely reflecting contemporary values.

While living together provides such opportunities, the typology of “Group Housing” (as defined by the San Francisco Planning Code) is vulnerable to exploitation by developers. Through reducing the amount of shared amenities, developers have maximized rentable space while creating little room for community. Making Space for Community offers a path for architectural design-research to be used as a catalyst for new policy that more equitably distributes resources. The project is a collaboration between the authors and grassroots intentional communities—learning from lived experience how to successfully shape a domestic commons. Simultaneously, the authors have collaborated with the Planning Department, using this ethnographically informed knowledge to design new Group Housing legislation.

Making Space for Community analyzes over forty contemporary collective living projects, revealing how these often invisible domestic typologies leverage space, resources, and labor to shape meaningful social groups. The case studies are analyzed through three lenses (i) Hardware, or physical spatial arrangements (ii) Software, or mechanisms of sharing; and (iii) Orgware, which includes governance and labor protocols. This shaped a whitepaper report that guided new Group Housing legislation in San Francisco — ensuring shared spaces that foster community. This unique approach foregrounds the agency of architects in mediating between the lived experience of communities and institutional protocols. Because San Francisco’s planning policy has often served as a model for other municipalities, this work provides a template for how more diverse voices can inform policy.

Collaborative Practice

Proposed by Thomas Dutton and Anthony Schuman to recognize ACSA’s commitment to community partnerships in which faculty, students and neighborhood citizens are valued equally and that aim to address issues of social injustice through design.

Winner

Home for Alice

John Folan & Candice Adams
University of Arkansas & Urban Design Build Studio (UDBS)

Abstract

In the Timberlands Region of Arkansas, nearly a quarter of the full-time essential workforce earns minimum wage, placing members of that population below the federal poverty threshold. Many more exist just above the poverty threshold. Over 40% of households are unable to afford basics, forcing impossible choices and risky trade-offs. Asset Limited, Income Constrained, and Employed – ALICE might be a cashier, waiter, childcare provider, or any productive contributor to the community. Where does ALICE live? Who is ALICE? What can be done to break the cycle limiting ALICE’s prosperity? How can ALICE be empowered?  These foundational considerations informed the development of a three-credit unit (3CU) undergraduate seminar at the Fay Jones School of Architecture + Design, A Just Home for The Arkansas Timberlands, that focused on the role designers can play in restoring dignity and justice through housing for rural communities in that region. A two-part pedagogical framework employed by the UDBS AR HOME LAB leveraged extensive data collection with the aspiration of reshaping dialogue related to financial hardship. The first component of work focused on ‘who’ and ‘where’, requiring students to explore human condition, asset mapping, collaboration opportunities, and context.  A subsequent and complementary component of work focused on ‘what’ and ‘how’, requiring analysis of extant housing typologies, labor force dynamics, logistics of regional residential construction, and culture. Sponsored by a grant from industry partner, Weyerhaeuser, research developed in the course supported grass-roots application findings through design. Students in the course were familiarized with local culture, community members, and vital stakeholders providing a platform for the development and construction of  a regionally specific, replicable housing prototype in the Arkansas Timberlands Region – Home for ALICE.

Winner

ʻŌlelo Hawaiʻi Campus: Architecture for Indigenous Language Revitalization and Normalization

Karla Sierralta & Brian Strawn
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa

Abstract

The ʻŌlelo Hawaiʻi Campus is a project aimed at supporting the revitalization and normalization of the Hawaiian language, ʻŌlelo Hawaiʻi.

After the overthrow of the monarchy in 1896, the Hawaiian language was outlawed from schools and replaced by the English language. It was not until the 1970s, during the second Hawaiian Renaissance, that cultural practices were publicly revived, and the Hawaiian language was rightfully acknowledged as one of the state’s two official languages. Since then, a small group of community leaders and educators have been working together to develop a complete educational system taught entirely in ʻōlelo Hawaiʻi. Along the way, the group has grown into a statewide coalition of schools and nonprofit organizations. Their success has seen Hawaiʻi become an aspirational model for similar indigenous language programs across the nation and around the world. In collaboration with these pioneers, this project aims to support this complete educational system spanning from preschool to Ph.D.

The ʻŌlelo Hawaiʻi Campus project was co-led by two principal investigators with a team that included students, recent grads, and experts working in close collaboration with six Hawaiian language and cultural education organizations.

Informed by nine Indigenous cultural pathways, multiple phases of user research, programming, and engagement sessions, the design proposes a master plan and three buildings centered on cultural alignments, protocol spaces, and indigenous worldview pedagogy.

A preschool, a production facility, a graduate school and cultural center, and the surrounding landscapes form a campus within a campus dedicated to furthering the Hawaiian Indigenous Language Cycle that goes beyond the traditional linear approach, aiming to extend its impact into orbits of family and community.

Winner

Crafting a Collaborative Curriculum: The Design Build Initiative

Michael Hughes, William Sarnecky, Gregory Spaw, Ammar Kalo, Patrick Rhodes, Kenneth Tracy, Juan Roldán, Marcus Farr, George Newlands, Camilo Cerro, Jason Carlow
American University of Sharjah
Daniel Chavez
Scarab Design
Emily Baker
University of Arkansas
Matt Trimble
Scenic City Nomads

Abstract

Located on the Arabian Penninsula the on-going Design Build Initiative (DBI) at the American University of Sharjah presents an alternative model of full-scale pedagogy that privileges a collective approach to hands-on education woven into all levels of the curriculum.  As such, this submission is not for a single project, but rather an overarching faculty collaboration and institutional process designed to address shortcomings in the academic design-build model.  The initiative features a diverse, evolving faculty collective working together within a supportive infrastructural framework designed to overcome the excessive stress associated with design-build in which a single faculty juggles responsibility for all aspects related to teaching, client engagement, logistics, accounting, construction supervision, and project delivery.  Even the most experienced  teachers suffer. Dan Rockhill notes that, “When I stagger away from these projects, I think ‘There has got to be an easier way’.” (Kraus, 2017).

The DBI experiment exemplifies an “easier way” to conduct full-scale pedagogy.  Working from a collaborative, holistic perspective the program successfully resolved many of the “five issues and challenges… present, to varying degrees in all” design-build programs.” (Canizaro, 2012) Collegial and administrative resistance, equipment and facilities, funding and quality of work have all been addressed to a great degree.  The new organizational framework foregrounds a team-based approach, curricular integration, and fluid teaching assignments that eschew individual entitlement or ownership. The large pool of faculty allows for a platoon system that keeps everyone fresh while also ensuring that participants teach non-DBI courses thereby defusing internal politics. Stress still exists, but participating faculty now operate within a supportive network of empathetic colleagues.

To date twelve DBI faculty have led hands-on coursework. Projects have been recognized with three ACSA awards, three JAE publications, and nine AIA design awards. Notably, each of the three ACSA award-winning projects was led by a different professor.

Winner

Bears Ears Education Center Outdoor Classroom

Elpitha Tsoutsounakis
University of Utah

Abstract

The Field Studio is a platform for collaborative practice engaging faculty, students, organizational partners and the broader community. The studio focuses on so-called Public Lands and the rural towns in close proximity. In this featured project, the studio worked with Bears Ears Partnership to design and build components for the Outdoor Classroom at the Bears Ears Educational Center in Bluff, Utah. We worked with partners in the community, local NGO’s and Federal and Tribal governing bodies of the Bears Ears National Monument. The project includes educational exhibits, furnishings, and interactive activities for local k-12 children and visitors to the BEEC.

Students are introduced to collaborative design methods and reflect on relational and reciprocal ways of engaging people and place. They develop design interventions in response to community partner prompts filling needs in research and design for our collaborators. The concepts designed in the studio are then further developed outside of the classroom with paid research assistants and partner staff. Students and faculty collaborate with a variety of trades and fabricators while also completing part of the construction in-house.

The collaboration also allows us to bridge complex relationships between government and NGO partners working together to manage public lands. Student projects in community spaces become prototypes for implementation in the Monument. This transformative educational experience gives students the opportunity to engage in community needs and shape their work in service to issues beyond the commercial market, while also seeing the complex process of implementing a project in the built environment. They are particularly proud of contributing to the community and seeing their designs executed in “real life”.

Faculty Design

To provide a venue for work that advances the reflective nature of practice and teaching by recognizing and encouraging creative design and design investigation in architecture and related environmental design fields and by promoting work that expands the boundaries of design through, for example but not limited to, formal investigations, innovative design process, addressing justice, working with communities, advancing sustainable practices, fostering resilience, and/or centering the human experience.

Winner

MESO-COSM

Brittany Utting
Rice University
Daniel Jacobs
University of Houston

Abstract & Participants

A mesocosm, or “medium world,”  is an infrastructure for long-term outdoor ecological experimentation. According to the systems ecologist Eugene P. Odum, mesocosms are situated between the microcosm of the laboratory and the macrocosm of the planet, enabling observations of real-world conditions. Filling the gap between these scalar extremes, mesocosms are critical research infrastructures for studying the effects of anthropogenic climate change. They are typically organized into arrays of self-similar environmental “patches” in which variables such as temperature or atmospheric composition are adjusted to simulate changes in an ecosystem. Alongside the technical labor of scientific research, they accommodate the intimate labor of tending and nurturing their interior worlds. This tending extends to the architecture itself as their envelopes are breathable, operable, and adjustable, suggesting new ways to reimagine architecture’s relationship to the land and its cycles. The open-endedness of the mesocosm offers a way to reorient environmental thinking toward a less controlled and increasingly entangled spatial practice.

MESO-COSM proposes four architectural prototypes that test this open-ended tectonic through calibrated enclosures and environmental systems. Typical architectural assemblies reject the exterior, hermetically enclosing the interior to remove any possibility of climatic mixing. Instead, is there an alternative way to design the envelope, to reclaim architecture as a planetary assemblage? Like mesocosms, we imagine that these prototypes are both lively machines and living experiments: full of inclement weathers, pollinated winds, and creaturely communities. Multi-layered roof filters, facade shading enclosures, as well as water and energy capture infrastructures encourage environmental adjustments at the scale of the building. These systems create thermal gradients and ventilation currents, enabling a more sensuous open-air interior. Situated in the uneasy space between technical mediation and environmental encounter, these “meso-types” suggest architectures that participate in the frictions and mediums of our changing climates.

Contributing Participants
Design/Exhibition Team: Anna Brancaccio, Nino Chen, Maximilien Chong Lee Shin, Harish Krishnamoorthy, Jane Van Velden Student Roles: The design and research team included graduate and undergraduate architecture students at Rice University. Students assisted with design research and fabrication of the exhibition and were paid hourly with university research grants.

Sponsors: MESO-COSM is sponsored by the Hines Scholar as Design/Design as Scholar (HdSd) Program of the Undergraduate Architecture Program at the Hines College of Architecture and Design, University of Houston. The exhibition is also funded by the Diluvial Houston Initiative, an Andrew W. Mellon Foundation-supported project, and Rice Architecture.

Photographers: Sean Fleming and Jason Chen.

Winner

Aging Against the Machine

Neeraj Bhatia
California College of the Arts
Ignacio González Galán
Barnard College
Karen Kubey
University of Toronto

Abstract & Participants

Aging is not a problem to be solved. The problem is the range of barriers—physical, social, financial, and cultural—that make it difficult to grow older with dignity and in community.

Older people in the United States are often either isolated at home or subjected to institutionalized forms of care. “Aging Against the Machine” advocates for alternative community development scenarios for aging that open up multiple options for care, improve physical access to the city, enhance resource sharing, and strengthen community ties.

In West Oakland, a culturally and racially diverse neighborhood, older residents are faced with precarious living conditions, insufficient public infrastructure and amenities, and limited caregiving options—effects of the legacies of redlining and disinvestment in social programs. Despite these challenges, residents are working together to advance the common good.

The area has long been a testing ground for civil rights movements and counterculture communities, producing alternative housing models, mutual aid networks, and initiatives—from Black Panthers programs to work inspired by Center for Independent Living resources for people with disabilities. Individual and collective initiatives continue to improve the neighborhood, including the community development work of the East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation and San Pablo Area Revitalization Collaborative.

“Aging Against the Machine” builds upon this past and ongoing work. The project has been developed in solidarity with local residents, who contributed through a series of roundtables and conversations. Making visible, connecting, and expanding local initiatives and amplifying resident voices, the project manifests through proposals in a range of scales—from interior home renovations to collective land ownership models and intergenerational housing projects. Diverse spaces for commoning and networks of care at the scale of the building and the neighborhood are integrated with public social programs and mutual aid initiatives, ultimately contributing to an intersectional, community-based approach to aging.

Contributing Participants
With: Todd Levon Brown: Environmental Psychology and Public Health Consultant; Lindsay A. Goldman: Healthy Aging Consultant (Grantmakers in Aging); Annie Ledbury: Community Partner (East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation)

Design/ Exhibition Team: Katharina Sauermann: Research Assistant; Pablo Saiz del Rio and Vivian Rotie: Model Production; Cesar Adrian Lopez: Drawing Production
Film Director: Yumeng Guo
Resident Liaison, Black Liberation Walking Tour: David Peters
Resident Collaborators: Juanita Nevis Cross, Ernest Johnson, Madlynn Johnson, Secret Peeples, Jackie Peters, and Jesse Williams
Winner

Susan’s House, design for a new typology

Mary English & Xavier Vendrell
Auburn University

Abstract, Participants & Image Credits

The house is in the oldest neighborhood in San Antonio, Texas. Lavaca is a historic district and is on the National Register of Historic Places. The design was required to follow their historic design guidelines and approval by their design review board. Requirements included a front porch, specific roof profile, window proportions and materials.

The lots in this section of Lavaca are narrow and deep and the traditional typology of the neighborhood results in little opportunity for a relationship between interior and exterior. The resulting arrangement is front yard, house, and back yard. Susan’s house stretches deep into the lot making space along its length for a series of courtyards and 2 porches, one required, facing the street and one, screened, a flexible room at the center of the house.

The solid wood door, at the front porch, leads into an exterior courtyard space, an outdoor foyer. From there a door accesses the interior, with courtyards, crossed and diagonal views, and transparencies.

The courtyards, oriented south-east, capture as much light as possible, organize the house with each interior and exterior space similar in scale. The screened porch is at the center of the house and the center of activity of the family. The use is flexible, dining room, living room or sleeping room with a nice breeze. The screened porch and the courtyards with trees modify the microclimate and enhance the airflow at the heart of the house.

The house is 1,967 sf of interior space with a spare material palette (concrete floors, white walls, metal roof and aluminum windows) where the only material expressed is the pair of solid wood entry doors to signify threshold. With this attitude, the exterior of the house adapts to the context of the neighborhood but creates some unexpected spaces inside.

Contributing Participants
Andreas Förnemark, team member
David Hill, Associate Professor at Auburn University, landscape architect
GE Reaves Engineering, structural engineers
Timothy Hursley, photographer

Image Credits
Photo © Timothy Hursley

Winner

Contested Circumpolar: Domestic Territories

Mason White & Kearon Roy Taylor
University of Toronto
Matthew Jull & Leena Cho
University of Virginia
Lola Sheppard
University of Waterloo

Abstract & Participants

Claimed by the eight Arctic nations—Canada, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden, United States—while also being the native territory to numerous Indigenous peoples, the Arctic embodies a complex, contested space in the 21st century. Territorial claims, resource extraction, climate change, and ongoing colonialism reflect the range of ways in which inhabitation has been imposed and negotiated in the last 100 years. Simultaneously, stories of daily life of inhabitants who call the Arctic home further reflect a richly heterogeneous cultural landscape at the forefront of accelerated transformations.

“Contested Circumpolar: Domestic Territories” presents eight narratives of inhabitation from each Arctic nation that reveals deep and complex connections between domestic space and the larger territory. The installation situates domestic life entangled with broader sociocultural, economic and geopolitical forces. It is presented as “core samples” capturing place-specific domestic-territorial linkages that are also emblematic of collective matters of concern in the Arctic. A series of rooms within each house juxtaposes the distinct artifacts and architectures of domestic life, while the territorial narratives on the underlying cores expose the interlinked far-flung contexts that give shape to these domestic scenes.

From mold to mines, from rooms to regions, circumpolar domestic space represents the frontline of transnational politics, Indigenous self-determination, and radical socio environmental adaptation.

Contributing Participants
Project Leads: Mason White, Lola Sheppard, Matthew Jull, Leena Cho, Kearon Roy Taylor
Student-Researchers: Anthony Averbeck, Vincent Chuang, Benjamin DiNapoli, Cam Fullmer, Sihan Lai, Katie LaRose, Jane Lee, Julia Nakanishi, Jonah Pruitt, Ben Small, Andrew Spears, Yuyin Sun, Timothy Victorio, Tian Wang, Zihao Wei.
[All student contributors were compensated through research funding.]
Funding: University of Virginia School of Architecture, Jefferson Trust, Anchorage Museum, University of Toronto Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape and Design, University of Waterloo, Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Design Build

To honor the best practices in school-based design-build projects.

Winner

The Mizer’s Ruin

Jason Griffiths
University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Abstract & Video Link

The Mizer’s Ruin is a 190 sq ft micro-dwelling that develops a low-carbon fabrication system through local forestry production. The project is based on harvesting, milling, fabricating and constructing processes, where over ninety percent of materials come from within a mile of the site. Of these materials a large majority are eastern red cedar (Juniperus Virginiana) which is conventionally regarded as unproductive lumber, incorrectly described as “invasive” and often destroyed and discarded to improve farmland.  We worked with state forestry agencies to develop a new forestry management plan that generated a new timber resource that mitigated the growing threat of wildfires from fuel build up. This resource provided constraints for student research that included field studies for material flows, round wood selection, in-situ milling (Wood Mizer), atypical dimensional lumber, charring techniques, and an analysis of “whole tree” usage. Our team applied this research to establish several dry assembly mass timber construction techniques that included the mechanically fastened wall, lap joined timber deck, and solid wood floors. While most building elements remained on site, the project also allowed for off-site research and fabrication of vacuum-bonded, cross laminated components that include exterior doors and built in furniture. Students were also engaged in on-the-fly documentation to include effort reporting, energy consumption and travel that was used in a comparative study of embodied energy consumption. The duration of this project from inception to completion lasted over 5 years and helped to reaffirm (during and post covid) important curricular structures for design-build pedagogy. The project was conducted through cohorts of graduate level students’, as well as undergraduate architecture students at third year level and landscape and interior design students in a collaborative 4th year studio. At all levels, students engaged directly with professional consultants, forestry specialists, academics, and project user groups.

Video Link:
MR Final Video

Winner

The Hip-Hop Xpress: Double Dutch Boom Bus

Kevin Erickson
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Abstract

The Hip-Hop Xpress is an internet-connected mobile classroom, recording studio, and performance venue that links communities across our state through a variety of programmed events and outreach initiatives. Inspired by George Washington Carver’s Jesup Wagon, Xpress travels to parks, community centers, schools, universities, and parking lots to spark connections among different generations, highlight Black cultural legacies, and invite young people to try new activities, all inspired by Hip Hop and its antecedents.

Our team undertook a multi-year process of engagement with community stakeholders, hosted participatory design events, and toured the emptied bus to test functionality. Three primary needs emerged that shaped the interior configuration: a gathering space for collaboration, a multi-purpose workbench, and seating booths for focused work.

We envisioned the interior as a scaffolding that can evolve over time. Ten furniture pieces were developed with multiple functions: seating, storage, power supply, sound production, lighting, acoustic dampening, transportation safety, and overall durability considerations for a moving vehicle.

The bus is powered by a solar array, providing enough capacity for most interior functions – except subwoofers. The majority of materials were sourced within a 500-miles radius. Items removed during demolition were recycled, reused or will be incorporated into a future design-build project.

Over sixty students – freshman to doctoral – from music, architecture, engineering and business participated in a 3-credit seminar taught by faculty and community leaders. Our goal, bring a diverse group of individuals together, discuss hip-hop from different perspectives, and create a mobile laboratory. Youth from the Boys & Girls Club and other constituencies attended our weekly course in what we term as ‘communiversity’.

University students lead every aspect from: community engagement, design, materials research, procurement, fabrication, assembly, installation, trades coordination, fixtures & finishes, budget, and client transition. They were evaluated based on effort and achievement.

Winner

Moscow Chamber of Commerce and Visitor Center

Scott Lawrence
University of Idaho

Abstract

The Moscow Chamber of Commerce and Visitor Center, located in the heart of the city’s historic downtown, plays a vital role in bringing commerce and community together. Unfortunately, the organization’s existing building was not effectively facilitating this role. Instead it was a mishmash of past uses, dating back to the 1920s, ranging from a utility company, to private offices, to a bank. We partnered with the Chamber to renovate the 3,150sf building. The renovated facility better aligns visitor and staff experience with the organization’s core mission.

As the city’s Visitor Center, the Chamber building has a role that transcends its primary use as office space; it sets the tone for the experience of Moscow through glimpses into the city’s unique identity. Each aspect of the design was viewed as an opportunity to connect building to place. This was accomplished by mapping material histories, phenomenological qualities, and cultural iconography onto specific project needs.

This ambitious approach, combined with a very limited budget ($14.60/sf), necessitated concurrent applied research into circular and vernacular construction strategies. Students investigated means of incorporating multiple streams of waste material from sources of local cultural significance. The design focused on surgical interventions during the demolition process; moving and reusing existing building elements, salvaging demolished material, and leaving ceiling/ mechanical assemblies in place that would typically be demolished and rebuilt. The project also recalls Moscow’s well-regarded history of brickmaking through the development of a mortar-less compressed earth block machine and partition wall system that challenges conventional office wall assemblies.

Through research, collaborative discussions, experimentation, prototyping, and construction students were able to provide a flexible and adaptable home for the Chamber. Integrating project responsive applied research and regenerative approaches resets the boundary for both students and the community of what architecture can be – both as a process and an outcome.

Winner

A Stop Worth Waiting For: Transit in Service of the Public Good

Julia Lindgren
University of Texas at Arlington

Abstract

This project partners university architecture students with the regional transit authority, Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) and AIA Dallas to design and build a next-generation bus shelter prototype. DART services 13 cities through 6,800 bus stops that accommodate over 20 million riders annually. Under its network plan, 74% of all residents live within a 10-minute walk of a bus stop, far greater than those who reside near a public park or community center. Bus stops are thus uniquely positioned to expand social, environmental, and economic infrastructure to areas of our cities currently underserved by public amenities.

Leveraging direct public engagement, the studio process and resulting designs respond to rider needs at both the individual shelter and network scales. Prototypes are designed as a kit of parts to enable a single bus stop to convert into a shelter overtime as user patterns and resources change. Shelters accommodate primary rider needs including a place to sit, wheelchair access, weather protection, and unobstructed views of oncoming buses. These features are enhanced by multi-lingual audio and lighting cues that alert riders and bus drivers in real-time, WIFI charging stations, renewable energy sources, community message boards, and safety alert buttons that convert shelters into micro resilient hubs. In addition, proposed partnerships with local organizations to incorporate public art and one tree at every stop transforms the bus network into public galleries capable of absorbing over 330,000 pounds of carbon dioxide annually, reducing temperatures at each stop by 2-9 degrees.

Constructed prototypes have sparked numerous conversations between DART, its riders, architects, and urbanites about the importance of design in the creation of public spaces and their amenities. Student work illustrates how maximizing the impact of small-scale interventions across geographies has the potential to redefine a city.

AIA/ACSA Practice + Leadership

To discover and recognize “best practice” examples of highly effective teaching, scholarship, and outreach in the areas of professional practice and leadership.

An AIA/ACSA Award.

Winner

Professional Horizons

Hans Herrmann, Abbey Franovich & Ashley Studdard-Hughes
Mississippi State University
Thomas Kligerman
Design Leadership Foundation

Abstract & Video Link

Teaching in a rural context within a rural state is not uncommon; however, this situation makes for an unusual educational circumstance. Just as an aspiring chef born and raised in desert country might struggle to understand the flavors of seafood in their cooking, a student of architecture in that same environment, will struggle to understand the notion of a lush landscape or wooden structure in their design thinking. Many students embark on their educational journey with extremely limited perspective. While libraries, media, and the internet have expanded access to information, they cannot fully replicate the lived experience of different places and spaces. Nor is it possible for any educational simulation to achieve true experiential high-fidelity as it relates to professional practice. These challenges, compounded by obstacles some student’s face due to their limited financial resources, race, ethnicity, or other limitation, are at the center of the initiative.

Professional Horizons is an ongoing, multi-platform educational initiative launched through a collaborative agreement between Mississippi State University (MSU) and the Design Leadership Foundation (DLF). The partnership was formed to generate models of engagement that counter, and work to shift, longstanding disparities of equity in the architecture, interior design, and landscape architecture professions. Mississippi State University has a strong record of promoting inclusion and equity, and the DLF, through professional association with members of the faculty, has invested in building new models for the preparation and encouragement of historically underrepresented students. The programs developed as part of this initiative are designed to bring awareness and provide opportunities to students who may not otherwise have had a clear view of achievable professional paths. From small materials and technology awards to semester long study away scholarships, our initiative targets the root causes behind the disparities seen in professional practice.

Video Link:
2021 Professional Horizons Design Leadership Foundation

Honorable Mention

Relocalize Our Food

Courtney Crosson
University of Arizona & Drachman Institute

Abstract

Archaeologists distinguish Tucson, Arizona as the oldest continuously-farmed landscape in North America. Currently, 18% of Tucson residents live in food deserts, communities in which low-income residents have restricted access to healthy and affordable foods. Despite its agricultural history, recent efforts to relocalize urban food production to meet these nutritional needs have raised concerns that the city is already water-stressed and cannot afford additional irrigation demands.

Relocalize Our Food is a public-private-academic partnership formed by multi-disciplinary researchers, local government agencies, four community food-cultivation organizations, and ten fifth-year B.Arch students and professor. Relocalize investigated the feasibility of expanding the urban food systems of Tucson across available municipal land using only locally sustainable water supplies: passive rainwater harvesting, active rainwater harvesting, and reclaimed water. This investigation resulted in four urban food system typologies: river adjacent, urban alley, community garden, and indoor controlled agriculture. The capacity to grow food across each of these typologies with locally sustainable water supplies was tested through geo-spatial analysis and hydrological modeling. Community assets and needs for multi-benefit solutions were identified through engagement activities with food cultivators, distributors, and neighborhoods. Ultimately, the research-design work discovered that over 100% of nutritional needs can be met with locally sustainable water sources if these typologies were implemented across the 711 acres of available municipal land in current food desert areas.

The work culminated in a public outdoor exhibition at a large historic garden in Tucson; this event served to disseminate the research-design, stimulate conversation, and offer a platform to gather feedback on the relocalization of urban food systems. Project impact has been significant; Relocalize’s community garden design is currently primed for by the county and community food bank, the city and county have dedicated portions of their comprehensive plans to sustainable relocalized food production, and news outlets have publicized Relocalize’s work.

AIA/ACSA Housing Design Education

To recognize the importance of good education in housing design to produce architects ready for practice in a wide range of areas and able to be capable leaders and contributors to their communities.

An AIA/ACSA Award.

Winner

Denver Low-Rise: New Domestic Forms of Collective Living

José Ibarra & Leyuan Li
University of Colorado Denver

Abstract

Denver Low-Rise: New Domestic Forms of Collective Living is the second foundational design studio in the 3-Year M.Arch program at the University of Colorado Denver College of Architecture and Planning. The course focuses on a spatial investigation of shared domestic spaces, speculating on a new paradigm of collective housing driven by the studio’s collective research on “Missing Middle” housing typologies.

Today, mid-sized and large American cities, such as Denver, Seattle, Albuquerque, Minneapolis, and Richmond, all have in common problems with housing affordability, gentrification, and homelessness. Denver, for instance, has one of the nation’s worst housing shortages, with the city having a deficit of approximately 70,000 units. This housing problem is even exacerbated by the predominant single-family housing model. With less land for building houses and with soaring prices for rent and mortgages, low- and moderate-income households have been displaced, which has diminished housing equity by intensifying the existing social and racial segregation. Moreover, the insistence on the idealized single-family housing has championed the privatization of public spaces, such as swimming pools and gardens, attenuating the advantage of sharing spaces and resources among a more diverse constituency. With less flexible arrangements, the current housing model fails to engage a wider variety of living demands, creating more barriers to expand the measures of affordability and collectivity celebrated by the real dwellers of contemporary cities.

​Responding to these conditions, this studio asks: how could we update the existing framework of “Missing Middle” housing and create new typologies that engage the diverse constituents of growing American cities? Thinking through new technologies and cultural shifts that inspire contemporary dwelling changes, what domestic forms—such as shared living rooms, collective kitchens, and communal laundry facilities—could be updated, reinvented, and collectivized to enable a common ground?

Winner

Housing Connecticut: Designing Healthy and Sustainable Neighborhoods

Andrei Harwell, Alan Plattus, Anika Singh Lemar, Kate Cooney & Elise Barker Limon
Yale University

Abstract

Housing Connecticut: Designing Healthy and Sustainable Neighborhoods is an interdisciplinary housing clinic inaugurated in the Fall 2022 semester at Yale University, organized by the Yale Urban Design Workshop, the School of Architecture’s community design center. Initiated in response to the severe shortage of affordable housing in Connecticut, this course brings faculty and graduate-level professional students in Architecture, Law, and Management together to collaborate with local non-profit affordable housing developers and State government to produce concrete, actionable, affordable housing proposals. The clinic provides an integrated educational model and bridges academia, practice, and impact on our local community.

Over the semester, faculty from Architecture, Law, and Management, along with guest practitioners, offer students an intensive “boot-camp” style introduction to the issues and practice of affordable-housing design and development.  Seminars on GIS mapping, data analysis, zoning, building codes, pro formas, financing, housing design, and community engagement provide a foundation for the students’ work with their development partners.  In parallel, student-led teams work directly with their developers to prepare new strategic models, to identify sites, and to create detailed design and development proposals.  Educational models borrowed from all three disciplines, including case studies, rounds, supervision, and critiques are blended to provide a range of project-based learning support to the student teams.

In 2023, three student teams collaborated with New Haven, Connecticut based developers, making proposals for three sites in the city’s most distressed neighborhoods. Anchored by affordable housing, projects critically engaged with other community development issues, including environmental justice, climate resilience, social equity, food scarcity, mobility, and health.

Housing officials from the State of Connecticut provided feedback throughout the course and made available pre-development funding to move projects toward realization.  One of the three projects is currently moving towards construction.  Three rounds of the clinic are currently planned, with the next in fall 2023.

Winner

Not for Sale! – Housing Education at the Intersection of Activism, Architecture, and Advocacy

Adrian Blackwell
University of Waterloo
Matthew Soules
University of British Columbia

Abstract

Not for Sale! is an innovative studies abroad course on contemporary housing that took place at the 2023 Venice Biennale of Architecture. The course taught students about the complex interrelationships between design, public policy, finance, and political action while allowing them to directly participate in an activist campaign against commodified housing.

The course invited students to collaborate with participants in Architects Against Housing Alienation’s ongoing housing campaign: Not for Sale! Altogether, students worked with ten activist organizations, ten architecture practices, and ten advocates. This diverse group includes experts on housing commodification’s disproportionate impact on the working class, women, and racialized people. Almost one-third of campaign participants are Indigenous activists, architects, and advocates who are at the forefront of examining the relationship between colonization and housing.

Thirty students were subdivided into teams who collaborated with a subset of activists, architects, and advocates to determine campaign tasks in a bottom-up fashion. Student work has included such things as researching new collective ownership models, designing a prototype for off-grid housing for Indigenous women and girls, developing a social media campaign around a gentrification tax, and case studies of intentional communities for unhoused people.

The University of British Columbia School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture and Waterloo School of Architecture jointly offered this for-credit course to both undergraduate and graduate students. Both universities provided generous financial support to ensure equitable access. The course, which ran for five months, took place inside the Canada Pavilion on the grounds of the Venice Biennale in Venice, Italy – an historic first. This setting afforded students the opportunity to make connections with the larger body of work at the Biennale while engaging visitors as an immediate experience in architectural activism.

Architectural activism is a vital frontier in architectural ‘practice.’ Through collaboration, discussion, research, drawing, modelling, and action, this course equipped students with the means to create housing that is socially, ecologically, and creatively empowering for all.

JAE Article Awards

The JAE Article Awards are delegated Awards given with the Annual Awards. The articles are for the preceding academic year. All peer-reviewed content published in the journal is eligible.

JAE Essay

Spatializing Reparations: Mapping Reparative Futures

Danika Cooper
University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

Moving toward an anti-colonial future requires that justice be spatialized and “part of the process of making a place” (Gilmore 2002, p 15-16). Making place thus demands redrawing the United States landscape as literal ground for Indigenous sovereignty by mapping boundaries of dispossession in order to propose new boundaries for the return of lands to Indigenous peoples. In this way, drawing is a foundational tool to visualize the United States’ liability in the spatial power dynamics enacted against Indigenous peoples and to offer strategies towards an anticolonial, antiracist future. And thus, visualizing the past and present conditions as means toward imagining new future engagement with land unsettles what Robert Nichols calls “recursive dispossession,” a process in which historic dispossessions generate property, which in turn reinforces and generates further dispossession—these processes have continually constructed enduring cycles of social, cultural, political, economic, and environmental injustices that are experienced in uneven ways and therefore must be overturned (Nichols 2019, p 117). Through this article, I explore the potentials of reconceiving the tools of architecture and landscape architecture— drawing and mapping space—as methods for spatializing calls for land-based reparations in the hopes of demonstrating the very real ways that the design disciplines can contribute actionably to creating just futures that consider the intersections between history, place-making, and racial structures. I present two different sets of rematriation strategies for the A:shiwi (also known as Zuni) and Tongva peoples to (a) demonstrate that histories of land dispossessions were not a uniform process but varied according to political, economic, and geographic conditions; and (b) show how those differences inform which types of new spatial logics are necessary and effective in rematriating lands back to Indigenous peoples, communities, and nations.

JAE Design Essay

Attending to Unbuilding: The One Tree Project

Jesse Vogler
Free University of Tbilisi
Ken Botnick
Independent Scholar
Alisa Blatter
Washington University in St. Louis

Abstract

This interdisciplinary design studio organized itself around the razing of an historic oak allée at Washington University in St. Louis, and used the imminent removal of forty-three 100-year-old oaks as a catalyst for project-based investigations into the greater cultural meaning of trees—and their loss. The One Tree Project took the territory of the tree as its classroom, with the oaks serving as site, subject, and platform for public research. Pedagogically, this project identifies attention and unbuilding as fundamental design competencies, and worked with a single tree—in our durational research and ritual felling—as a tool to participate in this transformation.

JAE Narrative

Worship the Lift Engineer

Jordan Whitewood-Neal
University of Brighton

Abstract

This paper discusses a little-known history of the Architectural Association’s (AA) short-lived Environmental Access course in the 1990s, a course that was designed not just ‘for’ but vitally ‘constituted of’ disabled people. It reflects on the legacy and implications of the course founder—Andrew Walker, a well-known tutor at the AA who was injured in an accident and wheelchair-bound for the remainder of his life. The course, viewed through the allegory of the lift at 36 Bedford Square, is a micronarrative meditation on repair, maintenance, and inheritance—of institutional values, priorities, and the need for reparative curricula.

TAD Research Contribution

The TAD Award for Research Contribution recognizes outstanding peer reviewed research published in Technology | Architecture + Design.

Volume 6

Decoding the Architectural Genome: Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms in Design

Mohammed Makki
University of Technology Sydney
Diego Navarro-Mateu
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Milad Showkatbakhsh
Architectural Association

Abstract

The application of population-based optimization algorithms in design is heavily driven by the translation and analysis of various data sets that represent a design problem; in evolutionary-based algorithms, these data sets are illustrated through two primary data streams: genes and fitness functions. The latter is frequently examined when analyzing the algorithm’s output, and the former is comparatively less so. This paper examines the role of genomic analysis in applying multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEA) in design. The results demonstrate the significance of utilizing the genetic analysis to understand better the relationships between parameters used in the design problem’s formulation and differentiate between morphological differences in the algorithmic output not commonly observed through fitness-based analyses..

Volume 6

Neural Image Classifiers for Historical Building Elements and Typologies

Andrew Witt
Harvard University
Eunu Kim
Trimble, Inc.

Abstract

New technologies of machine vision and artificial intelligence (AI) are opening fresh avenues to catalog and compare the entire corpus of built architecture. While neural net technology is rightly embraced as a promising generative paradigm for architecture, it also holds enormous promise for historical work, notably the automatic scanning and organization of as-built imagery and video of buildings and cities. We argue that one may apply AI-driven machine vision tools to scan and classify architectural imagery based on stylistic and morphological considerations. Combined with data science methods, such tools enable a comprehensive view of historic architectural features and types.

Annual Meeting Best Paper & Best Project

The Best Paper and Best Project Awards recognizes outstanding peer reviewed research presented at the ACSA Annual Meeting. Sponsored by the College of Distinguished Professors the award will promote research, scholarship and creative excellence.

Winners will be announced at the ACSA112 Annual Meeting in Vancouver, BC, March 14-16, 2024.

Juries

Topaz Jury
Illya Azaroff, +LAB architects
Colt Brock, American Institute of Architecture Students
Elizabeth Danze, University of Texas at Austin
Bradford Grant, Howard University
Karen Lu, Snow Kreilich Architects

Distinguished Professor Jury
Thomas Barrie, North Carolina State University
Gail Dubrow, University of Minnesota
Sharon Haar, University of Michigan
Ikhlas Sabouni, Prairie View A&M University
LaVerne Wells-Bowie, Florida A&M University

New Faculty Teaching Jury
Julia Andor, American Institute of Architecture Students
Kody Cheung, Drexel University
Shelby Doyle, Iowa State University
José Gámez, University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Diversity Achievement Jury
Maged Guerguis, University of Tennessee-Knoxville
Sharon Haar, University of Michigan
Mohamed Ismail, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Collaborative Practice Jury
Aziza Chaouni, University of Toronto
Joshua Foster, East Los Angeles College
Nils Gore, University of Kansas

Housing Design Education Jury
Christina Bollo, University of Oregon
Melissa Daniel, AIA Housing & Community Development KC
Kwesi Daniels, Tuskegee University
Erkin Özay, University at Buffalo

Creative Achievement Jury
Catherine Hamel, University of Calgary
Ozayr Saloojee, Carleton University
Paola Zellner-Bassett, Virginia Tech

Faculty Design Jury
María González Aranguren, University of Virginia
Pavlina Ilieva, PI.KL Studio
Marcelo López-Dinardi, Texas A&M University
Nicole McIntosh, Architecture Office
Felipe Mesa, Arizona State University

Design-Build Jury
Edward Becker, Virginia Tech
Shelby Doyle, Iowa State University
Rick Sommerfeld, University of Colorado Denver

Practice & Leadership Jury
Shelby Doyle, Iowa State University
Pari Riahi, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Karina Ruiz, BRIC Architecture
Mark Walsh, Perkins&Will

JAE Article Awards Jury
JAE Editorial Board
ACSA Board of Directors

TAD Research Contribution Award Jury
TAD Editorial Board
ACSA Board of Directors

Best Paper & Best Project Jury
ACSA College of Distinguished Professor
ACSA Board of Directors

Congratulations to all the award winners!

View the original Call for Nominations & Submissions