March 30-April 1, 2023 | St. Louis, MO

111th Annual Meeting

IN COMMONS

Schedule

June 8, 2022

Abstract Deadline

August 2022

Author Notification

October 12, 2022

Submission Deadline

December 2022

Presenter Notification

March 30 - April 1, 2023

ACSA111 Annual

Call for Reviewers

ACSA is seeking qualified architecture faculty and practitioners to serve as peer reviewers. This is an exciting opportunity to be a part of ACSA and contribute to architectural research. Peer reviewers are essential to the integrity of ACSA’s review process and we greatly appreciate your interest.

Desired Qualifications
  • Record of peer-review conference presentation or publication;
  • Current teaching position in architecture or affiliated field; OR
  • Experience with architectural research outside of academia

ACSA’s Annual Meeting Committee will review all submissions for qualifications. All submitters will receive a response about their status.

Responsibilities
  • Phase I: Review ten to twelve 500-word abstracts (this may vary based on submission numbers) and provide ratings and comments;
  • Phase II: six-eight 4000-word papers/1000-word projects and provide ratings and comments.
  • Work with ACSA staff to maintain the blind review process;
  • Opportunity to participate, as a Reviewer, in the second stage of the peer review process by reading and rating full papers.
Sample Review Forms
Abstract Submissions
  1. Does the abstract indicate a new and original contribution to the field?
  2. Does the abstract present a clearly articulated argument or question with supporting methods and compelling content?
  3. Given your review of the abstract, is the author(s) well-positioned to further develop the paper and/or project successfully?
  4. Comments for the Authors: Please provide constructive comments for the author(s).
Full Submissions
  1. Does the paper/project make a new and original contribution to the field?
  2. Does the paper/project present a clearly articulated thesis with supporting methods and compelling content?
  3. Given your review, has the author(s) developed the paper/project successfully?
  4. Overall, would you accept this paper/project for presentation at the ACSA Annual Meeting?
  5. Comments for the Author: Please provide constructive comments for the author(s) this full submission.

Michelle Sturges
Conferences Manager
202-785-2324
msturges@acsa-arch.org

Eric W. Ellis
Sr. Director of Operations and Programs
202-785-2324
eellis@acsa-arch.org