Auburn University

APLA alum Nicholas Holt (‘93) was recently named a Senior Fellows of the Design Futures Council by the Design Futures Council (DFC). Technical director at Skidmore, Owings & Merrill’s New York office, Holt was one of thirteen inductees named for “significant contributions toward the understanding of changing trends, new research, and applied knowledge that improve the built environment and the human condition.” (http://www.di.net/news/design-futures-council-announces-2013-senior-fellows/)

Professor Christian Dagg, AIA, has been named as Program Chair for the Master of Integrated Design & Construction program, a collaborative academic program between the School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Architecture and the McWhorter School of Building Science.  Dagg has been on the faculty of Auburn University’s School of Architecture since the fall of 2000, where he has served in several leadership positions, including Program Chair for Interior Architecture and a year level coordinator for Second and Fourth Year Design Studios in Architecture.

A retrospective of the work of Professor Emeritus, Robert L. Faust will be hosted by the Department of Art in the College of Liberal Arts at the Biggin Art Gallery, Biggin Hall, Auburn University during the month of December. Drawings, photographs and models of Faust’s work as an architect will be featured. The exhibit is curated by APLA’s Professor Christian Dagg.

An integrated studio of third and fourth year Interior Architecture students has mounted an exhibit cataloging design possibilities for the Atlanta Central Library in Atlanta, Georgia. Commissioned in the late 1960’s but not completed until 1980, the iconic downtown library is the final building by celebrated modern architect Marcel Breuer (1902-1981). Using the work of Breuer as a guide, the studio led by Kevin Moore and Nathan Foust has re-imagined the expansive public interior by developing meaningful luminous and acoustic variety. The exhibit of student work is on display in the Dudley Commons Gallery, at Auburn University’s College or Architecture Design and Construction, weekdays until September 30.

The School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Architecture’s Rural Studio has been awarded a $42,000 grant from the National Endowment for the Arts to support the documentation of the Rural Studio’s 20 years of bringing quality design to rural Alabama. The project will include the creation of a documentary and social media campaign that highlights Rural Studio’s anniversary project to build eight 20K House projects. Art Works grants support exemplary projects in thirteen artistic disciplines and fields: arts education, dance, design, folk and traditional arts, literature, local arts agencies, media arts, museums, music, opera, presenting, theater and musical theater, and visual arts.

OCUS 11 ante litteram, an exhibition of new works by Margaret Fletcher, Assistant Professor in the School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Architecture, will open on Saturday, September 14, at Sandler Hudson Gallery in Atlanta, Georgia. An opening reception will be on Saturday, September 14 from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m., and Fletcher will deliver an artist talk on Saturday, October 12 at 2 p.m.

The 2013 Lecture Series of the Auburn University School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Architecture is entitled “Renegades + Outlaws: Design Thinking at the Edge.”  The series is conceived as a way to consider perceptual outliers within the design profession. Wide interpretation of the lecture series theme is encouraged, from practitioners that rely on collaborative practices of art, architecture, filmmaking, and design to practitioners that engage in significant contextual work designed to profoundly affect the essential community in which it resides. Lecturers will elaborate on projects, processes, research, motivation, missions, etc. that have evolved within their practices and have created moments that we can identify as driven by designers who are outlaws and renegades. Details for about the lecturers and the lecture calendar can be found at:  http://cadc.auburn.edu/apla/Lists/APLANews/DispForm.aspx?ID=207

University at Buffalo

Joyce Hwang was selected to participate in the 2014 International Architecture Biennale Rotterdam (IABR), “Urban by Nature.” She will be building and installing a second iteration of “Bat Cloud” at the Kunsthal in Rotterdam, Netherlands as part of the Biennale’s exhibition. Joyce also received an Awesome Without Borders grant (from the Awesome Foundation + the Harnisch Foundation) to help support this project.

ACSA Moves Ahead With Developing Career Outcomes Data Effort

Based on a call for input in August 2013, nearly 30 schools have shared their experiences and goals, representing all of ACSA’s regions and a broad range of school and program sizes and types, both accredited and non-accredited. Among these schools there was strong interest in developing and participating in an ACSA-wide career outcomes survey effort.

A detailed summary of what we’ve learned from these conversations can be found here. This includes a note on how many schools currently have exit and post-graduation surveys; some best practices addressing the challenges of maintaining alumni contact information and increasing response rates; and a list of values that schools expressed relative to the development of an ACSA-wide instrument.

With this input and the guidance of a Data Collection and Research Advisory Committee, the ACSA is aiming to present an initial proposal in time for in-person feedback and discussions at the Administrator’s Conference in Providence,November 14-16, 2013. Our goal is to develop a pilot exit and post-graduation survey for a limited number of interested schools to deliver in spring/summer 2014, with a wider round to follow.

If your school may be interested in participating in this initial pilot survey, please get in touch with Lian Chang at lchang@acsa-arch.org or 202 785.2324. You can also share your thoughts by commenting below.

Is There Global Competition for Students and Graduates?

Untitled Document

By Michael J. Monti

This year’s meetings of the European Heads of Schools of Architecture took up familiar themes of managing change within budgetary and other constraints, but one day’s discussion was particularly relevant to the North American context. In October, the European Parliament will vote to update the Architect’s Directive, the law that is the basis for the recognition of professional qualifications across the European Union. As reported by keynote speaker Howard Davies of the European University Association (roughly akin to the American Council on Education in the United States), the Architect’s Directive will soon change to have new educational qualifications.

Previously, the minimum educational qualifications were 4 years of study. Now the minimum qualifications will be 4 years in university + 2 years of practice or 5 years in university + 0 years practice. The 11 points (see sidebar) that outline the architect’s core knowledge and skills will remain the same, and, in fact, have remained the same for decades.

The Directive’s qualifications are the legal basis by which one E.U. country must recognize the credentials of an architect from another E.U. country. What this will mean for European schools was the matter for discussion.

The 5-year degree model matches the Bologna Accord’s structure of 3 years undergraduate study + 2 years of master’s level study. If there are no obligations for internship after this, then what are the obligations of 5-year programs to address practical experience? And in a 4+2 architecture framework—which does not match the Bologna Accord and is not followed by most of the schools in Europe—is 4 years of study sufficient preparation?

Countries in the E.U. can, and do, have higher standards for licensure than the minimums established by the European Union. But if country A has regulations that meet the Architect’s Directive and provide a license in 5 years, and country B requires 6 years or longer to become an architect, then a new architect from country A can automatically move to new country B to practice, while students and graduates in country B are still training.

If the bar for admission to the profession is lowered by E.U. regulations, then over time will the system migrate toward the minimum standards? The Architect’s Directive opens up clearer competition between countries for students and interns. But does it also increase the level of competition between Europe and other countries or economies?

The demand for talent in architecture firms is now global. NCARB reports it takes on average more than 7 years from graduation to licensure. Assuming a 5-year professional degree, that’s 12 years to licensure. So do economies that have a faster path from education to practice put their graduates at greater advantage?

acsa

The 11 Points of the Architect’s Directive

(a) ability to create architectural designs that satisfy both aesthetic and technical requirements;

(b) adequate knowledge of the history and theories of architecture and the related arts, technologies and human sciences;

(c) knowledge of the fine arts as an influence on the quality of archi_ tectural design;

(d) adequate knowledge of urban design, planning and the skills involved in the planning process;

(e) understanding of the relationship between people and buildings, and between buildings and their environment, and of the need to relate buildings and the spaces between them to human needs and scale;

(f) understanding of the profession of architecture and the role of the architect in society, in particular in preparing briefs that take account of social factors;

(g) understanding of the methods of investigation and preparation of the brief for a design project;

(h) understanding of the structural design, constructional and engineering problems associated with building design;

(i) adequate knowledge of physical problems and technologies and of the function of buildings so as to provide them with internal conditions of comfort and protection against the climate;

(j) the necessary design skills to meet building users’ requirements within the constraints imposed by cost factors and building regulations;

(k) adequate knowledge of the industries, organisations, regulations and procedures involved in translating design concepts into buildings and integrating plans into overall planning.

Give Us Your Thoughts on the New Conditions

By Norman Millar, ACSA President

As we shared a few weeks ago, NAAB recently published new draft Conditions for Accreditation that will affect graduates of schools as far out as 2019. ACSA is developing a formal response to the draft and plans to send out a questionnaire later in October. To help us prepare, we invite you to discuss with your colleagues a number of key issues arising from the Conditions draft.

International Accreditation: Condition II.2.1, Regional Accreditation, would allow schools that do not have U.S. regional accreditation to seek official validation by NAAB. The effect of this seems to allow international programs to seek accreditation. Currently the American University of Sharjah is the only non-U.S. program with accreditation, but because the university holds regional accreditation, it satisfies the current Condition. Presumably, graduates of an international NAAB-accredited program would have access to U.S. licensure processes, although this is not confirmed. How would this change affect architectural schools in North America?

Learning Environments: For the first time, NAAB is acknowledging the existence of online education in architecture. Condition I.2.2, Physical Resources, requires programs to address how “online course delivery” changes space and physical resource requirements. But has higher education moved beyond a binary world of in-person versus online education? Would it be preferable to simply define what an adequate learning environment means, in terms of digital and physical facilities? (Pop quiz: how many accredited online architecture programs can you name?)

Mobility & Flexibility: NAAB continues to try to improve clarity in guidelines for handling transfer students and students that start in a program after a non-architecture degree. Of concern is the statement in Condition II.2.2, Professional Degrees and Curriculum, that for B.Arch and certain M.Arch degrees all required credit hours must be “delivered by the same institution.” The wording seems to forbid transfers and impede articulation agreements between community colleges and architecture programs, although we think this was not intended. Should NAAB be making policies that require schools to account for educational content completed in a variety of settings? This could be content taken at other institutions or content completed by students in different settings. For example, could students satisfy Student Performance Criteria in varying internship experiences, rather than a required studio course that everyone takes?

Many other topics within the draft Conditions merit discussion:

  • What is the impact of moving details on how programs can demonstrate various Conditions to a separate APR guidelines document? Would the guidelines stay consistent for five years or could they change from year to year?
  • How can the new Perspectives (Condition I.1.4) be improved or streamlined further?
  • How can redundancies between the Perspectives and the Student Performance Criteria be further reduced? For example, the Career Development Perspective details “all sorts of traditional and non-traditional settings.” This is covered by SPC C.4, Non-traditional Forms of Practice.
  • What about the other SPC changes?

We ask for your feedback in the Comments section below or at arc@acsa-arch.org.



             
Download the 2014 NAAB Conditions for Accreditation First Draft
    


             
Download the ACSA/ARC Position Paper


University at Buffalo

Professor Carter was the editor of the book that was  recently published by TUNS PRESS and which highlighted the work of the award winning Canadian designers Battersby Howat.

Dennis Maher‘s exhibition “Common Cosmos: 287 F-14853” has opened at Sibley Hall Dome, Cornell University.  The exhibition runs until December 20. An article in the Cornell Chronicle reviewed the exhibition: http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/2013/10/embedded-life-stuff-dennis-mahers-work.  Maher has published “Nightworks,” photographic works and text, in the Fall issue of MAS Context: http://www.mascontext.com/issues/19-trace-fall-13/nightworks/. Maher has also published an essay in a special issue of the peer-reviewed journal Dada/Surrealism. The essay, entitled “Luxor, Endlessness and the Continuous Key: Architecture and the Esoteric in Breton, Kiesler, and Schwaller de Lubicz” may be read at http://ir.uiowa.edu/dadasur/.

Nick Bruscia and Chris Romano completed Project 2XmT in partnership with a local metal production company, Rigidized Metals. An article about the work was published in the Buffalo News at: http://mobile.buffalonews.com/?articleRedirect=1

Dean Robert Shibley has received the American Institute of Architects New York State (AIANYS) 2013 Educator Award. The prize recognizes notable contributions and accomplishments by an architectural educator in New York State, and Shibley accepted the award at the AIANYS annual convention, held recently in Syracuse, N.Y. Since joining the School of Architecture and Planning in 1982, Shibley has served as professor in both the architecture and planning departments, with eight years as chair of architecture (1982-1990). He was appointed dean in 2011. Learn more: http://ap.buffalo.edu/news-events/latest_news.host.html/content/shared/ap/articles/news/shibley_educatoraward.detail.html

Dean Robert Shibley was recently featured in Domus, an international magazine on architecture, art and design, in a Q&A feature investigating the process behind the realization of UB’s Solar Strand. The 3,200-panel, ground-mounted solar array envisions energy in a new way, as part of a new cultural landscape. As campus architect for the University at Buffalo and chair of the artist selection committee for the Solar Strand, Shibley guided the vision and installation of the 750-kilowatt array, designed by renowned landscape architect and artist Walter Hood. Read the article here:  http://www.domusweb.it/en/interviews/2013/09/02/forms_of_energy_.html

UB architecture students, Wei Dai and Minku Jeon, were awarded second prize in the 2013 ACSA Fabric in Architecture Design Competition. The students were enrolled in ARCH 404 “Collaboration + Competition’ taught by Professor Brian Carter and Adjunct Professor Michael Williams.

Current Architectural Publishing Trends and Information Access Challenges For the Educational Market: Survey Results

Barbara Opar and Barret Havens, column editors
Column submitted by Janine Henri, UCLA Architecture, Design, and Digital Services Librarian 

In preparation for a panel at the 2013 AASL conference in San Francisco, architecture school librarians were surveyed about architectural publishing trends and information access challenges. These survey results were used to formulate questions for the discussion session: Archizines, blogs, web portals, oh my! Current architectural publishing trends and information access challenges for the educational market (more details on this panel can be found on the conference program).  Twenty-nine survey responses were submitted between February 22 and March 14, 2013. A compilation of the survey results is available here.

In general, although survey respondents see increasing amount of online content as a trend, they still note some reluctance on the part of publishers to adopt digital formats.  Unfortunately, the majority of survey respondents do not see a trend towards an increasing amount of open source online publications.  Device-specific content and lack of IP authentication or site licenses are identified as access barriers. Lack of content indexing, uncertain format longevity or preservation, and content embargoes are also seen as information access challenges, as are prohibitive cost structures or unacceptable licensing terms.

Seven months have passed since AASL members were surveyed and it is likely that some of the challenging titles identified this spring may no longer be of concern (e.g. 2g is now available through additional ebook platforms). Nevertheless, some access barriers are ongoing, and, no doubt, new ones will emerge. By identifying these challenges and discussing them with publishers or suppliers, and by sharing possible solutions with fellow members, AASL members can work together to advocate for the information needs of architecture students and faculty.

Plagiarism by Design

Barbara Opar and Barret Havens, column editors
Article submitted by Barret Havens, Assistant Professor and Outreach Librarian, Woodbury University

With so much emphasis on team-based projects and collaborative learning, the distinction between plagiarism and “sharing” can become blurry for students in any discipline. However, this distinction is especially difficult for students of architecture and other design-related disciplines to make. In her article, “New Twists on an Old Problem: Preventing Plagiarism and Enforcing Academic Integrity in an Art and Design School,” Beth Walker highlights a few reasons why this is the case. I have used her article to generate discussion in the information literacy course I have taught for several semesters now. Here, I will present some concerns unique to architecture and design schools with regard to plagiarism. Most have arisen from those discussions and my own musings on the topic.

An obvious reason why students in design-related disciplines may run afoul of academic honesty policies is the time crunch (48). Design-intensive majors, especially at the undergraduate level, are synonymous with all-nighters in studio and putting the finishing touches on projects hours—if not minutes—before they are due. Survival, rather than adherence to campus plagiarism policies may be an architecture student’s foremost concern after pulling an all-nighter in studio, regardless of whether the work requiring documentation is a major-sequence course or a writing course required of all undergraduates.

In addition, students have been encouraged to learn by imitating the masters for millennia (49). The recreation of another’s work or the incorporation of principles gleaned from case studies is a practical approach to learning. But where does one draw the line between “studying” and plagiarizing, and how do architecture faculty and architecture librarians convey to students how to draw that line for themselves?

Further complicating the matter is the fact that detecting plagiarism in visual representations is not easy to do. For instance, when comparing forms, how would architecture faculty or librarians establish that one form bears enough resemblance to another to determine that plagiarism has taken place? The landscape of “visual plagiarism” is a nebulous one indeed. Defining the rules and applying some objective method of defining plagiarism within this landscape is far more challenging than evaluating a case of text-based plagiarism.

And last, but not least: architecture students have not been asked, consistently, to cite the sources that have influenced their design projects. Instead, they are typically given a list of precedents that serve as a palette from which they might draw ideas or principles. Though they may, during reviews or pinups, discuss how and where they incorporated these ideas, written attribution is often overlooked. So, though they may have been asked on a relatively consistent basis to cite textual sources that have been incorporated into the academic writing they complete, architecture students may come to view visually-based works as an exception to the rule.  Some may even generalize further that rules of plagiarism don’t apply to their discipline.

The key to tackling these challenges is communication. Librarians must continue to reach out (and reach out even further) to architecture faculty by offering resources and techniques for detecting plagiarism and citing sources, along with ways to bring students into the conversation.  Librarians and architecture faculty must explore whether the two camps are even on the same page regarding the necessity of citing sources in the aforementioned scenarios. If they aren’t, then we may be sending mixed messages to students. By entering into a dialogue about where and when citing sources is necessary, architecture faculty and librarians can combine forces to enhance students’ understanding of plagiarism and how to avoid it. Time spent now by all parties will reap benefits down the road.

 

 

Walker, Beth. “New Twists on an Old Problem: Preventing Plagiarism and Enforcing Academic Integrity in an Art and Design School.” Art Documentation 28.1 (2009): 48-51. Print.

 

 

University of Toronto

Blanche L. van Ginkel, Professor Emeritas at the University of Toronto, and a Past President of ACSA, was honoured by the Corporation of Urbanists of Quebec which instituted a prize in her name  in celebration of the 50th Anniversary of its founding, recognizing her as one of the three Founders.

Auburn University

APLA Alum Ginger Krieg-Dosier (B.Arch / B.Int.Arch.’00), and her company bioMASON, won the 2013 Postcode Lottery Green Challenge, and €500,000, with the invention of a sustainable brick that is “grown” using bacteria and has a CO2 free production process. The Postcode Lottery Green Challenge is considered the largest annual worldwide competition for entrepreneurs and was created to instigate change and discover new products or services that combine sustainability with change.

On Sept 30 Carlos Jiménez, Principal and Lead Designer at Carlos Jiménez Studio_ lectured at Auburn University’s School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Architecture as part of the 2013 fall lecture series titled, “Renegades + Outlaws:  Design Thinking at the Edge.” Carlos Jiménez Studio is an award winning, internationally recognized firm founded in 1983 and is based in Houston, Texas. 

Architect and APLA Alum, Al York, AIA (’88, BArch) celebrates with his firm McKinney York Architects (www.mckinneyyork.com) the announcement that they are honored with the 2013 Architecture Firm Achievement Award, given by the Texas Society of Architects (TxA). Recognized as the highest honor the Texas Society of Architects can confer upon an architecture firm, McKinney York now takes its place among a select group of influential Texas firms who have also received this award. 

“Wanderlust,” a letterpress project created by Kyle Wherry, a fourth-year student in the School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Architecture, has been chosen for exhibition in the “918 Letterpress Ephemera Show” at Samford University in Birmingham, October 18 to November 29. Out of 548 entries, Wherry’s was one of the 129 chosen to be part of the show; it will be published in the exhibition catalog and become part of the permanent collection at Samford University. Wherry created “Wanderlust,” an accordion fold book, in a Letterpress course that was taught summer semester by Robert Finkel, an assistant professor of graphic design

Professor Matt Hall (ARCH) joins the School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Architecture (APLA) faculty this 2013 fall semester with the following adjunct instructors:  Nathan Foust (ARCH), Judd Langham (MLA), Jeff Collins (ARCH), Jacqueline Margetts (MLA), Randall Vaughan (ARCH), Ben Weisman (ARCH/MCP – Urban Studio), John Threadgill (MLA), Xavier Vendrell (ARCH – Rural Studio), Dick Hudgens (ARCH-Rural Studio).

A team of students from architecture, community planning and landscape architecture won the 2013 National Organization for Minority Architects (NOMA) Student Design Competition. The student team included Tina Maceri, Alex Therrien, Cordetrus Johnson, Jason Groomes,Yubei Hu, Taiwei Wang, Torrance Wong, Valecia Wilson, Sarah Curry, Claudia Paz-Melendez, Jack Mok, George Criminale, and Byung Choe. Faculty advisors Kevin MooreMargaret FletcherDr. Carla Jackson Bell and Nathan Foust provided team support. An Auburn APLA team has won this competition three years in a row.

On September 20 the School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Architecture held an annual awards banquet to honor student award and scholarship recipients. This event also celebrates the donors of each student gift, and provides them with an opportunity to spend time with the student recipient.